Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 02:15 PM 5/31/02 -0500, Matthew Powell wrote: >The other is that while Stalinist Communism and Nazism are both >authoritarian and nationalist in nature, Nazism drew its support from >the capitalists and industrialists of the mid-war period, because it >strove to give them more power. Not really, though your version IS the left-wing myth. The Nazis had almost no support from German capital until after they had achieved power. (See, say, Toland or Shirer for the few examples to the contrary, such as Fritz Thyssen). The Nazis rode to power precisely as did the Soviets, by building a coalition of middle-class and agrarian classess with a substantial number of industrial workers thrown in for good measure. And, of course, both movements share the same roots, in Hegelian dialecticalism. Reading Marxist and Nazi doctrine is interesting only in that it is indistinguishable -- both share not just incredible trivialization, logical lacunae, and REALLY boring styles but, in the end, they share their philosophies. The only difference is in the terminology - -- the doctrines are identical. Marc msmall@infi.net FAX: +276/343-7315 Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir! - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html