Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Photoshop dilemma
From: "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@harbornet.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 12:11:55 -0700
References: <10FCBA241491031-01@MMS__lehman.com_> <00ff01c1fc1a$09c46660$9740b8c7@nsula.edu>

I'm sure we are going to now hear opinions from some of the lawyers in
the group as to what's what regarding the "truth" of photographs used as
evidence or in support of evidence.

Ted in Olalla

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "SonC (Sonny Carter)" <sonc@sonc.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Photoshop dilemma


> Isn't photography and video considered "support" for evidence and
> testimony, rather than evidence in fact as regards the justice system?
>
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
>
>
> Neil sez: In another fifty years or so, I doubt whether a video or a
> photograph will be accepted as
> evidence it court as the means to produce doctored images
> indistinguishable from the real thing will be within the reach of
> almost anyone.
>
> We'll have to go back to trusting people's reputations and integrity
> when we
> form our view of the World.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: Photoshop dilemma)
In reply to: Message from "Beddoe, Neil" <nbeddoe@lehman.com> (RE: [Leica] Re: Photoshop dilemma)
Message from "SonC \(Sonny Carter\)" <sonc@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Photoshop dilemma)