Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> We must clarify and find agreement on definitions in discussions > such as this. > > Jerry Ulesman = photographer > photograph = one image made with a camera > photomontage = combining two or more images > > so > > Jerry Ulesman = both photographer and photomontage artist, most > widely known for his work as photomontage artist. > > His most acclaimed images = photomontages made up of two or more > photographs. > > George > So does Gene Smith = photomontage artist...? (or was he using a cardboard cut-out shape, so it really isn't a photomontage)- either way - My point being that one of WE Smith's most well known "photographs" has generally been accepted as such, despite the manipulation. It captures a truth about Schweitzer that Smith's camera didn't - but overall, it's still considered a photograph tim a tim a - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html