Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] LTM vs. M
From: "Roland Smith" <>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 22:27:13 -0700
References: <>

I am an amateur photographer having begun in 1957 with a IIIg.   I use LTMs
IIIa through IIIg as well as M3s, M4-2s and M6.   I tend to use the M3 often
for the viewfinder and the M6 when I want the meter.

Roland Smith
Oakland, California

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Amundsen" <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 10:18 AM
Subject: [Leica] LTM vs. M

> Hello everyone, I'm curious the ratio of M user's on the LUG to regular
> LTM user's. When I purchased my first leica, an M2, last year I had two
> cameras in mind. It was a desicion between a IIIf with lens and the M2
> with 50mm lens.  At the last minute I decided to go with the M for
> various reasons. First the availablility of repair parts for M's seemed
> better. Second the ease of use of the combined VF/RF on the M's. Finally
> the ability to use modern lenses.
> Today LTM user's can also use modern lenses (the Cosina Voigtlander
> series), so I am again interesed in an older screw mount leica! What are
> the favorites of the LUG members? I love the size of the LTM cameras
> with a collapsible lens: pocketable! I'm leaning toward a IIIc or IIIf.
> Will I need to have a second body as a 'parts' camera if repairs are
> ever needed? Any advice from your combined expertise would be greatly
> appreciated! With my M2 on it's way for a repair, for who knows how
> long, I'm experiencing my first 'Leica withdrawl'!
> Thanks for the time! Andrew
> --
> To unsubscribe, see

- --
To unsubscribe, see

In reply to: Message from "Andrew Amundsen" <> ([Leica] LTM vs. M)