Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] The notta thread
From: "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 07:24:01 -0700
References: <10B1C6E9-6284-11D6-9EB1-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca>

Hi John... not to get sidetracked from the real issue here but,   the doctor, lawyer,
candle stick maker thing was taken out of context , and incorrectly linked to Leica, when
in fact it was stated with respect to Hexar.....damned,      oh my,  poor Hexar, its image
ruined,    a tool of the rich.....    ;-)    Steve

> Pursuant to Dante's Hexar review, and in no way a negative reflection on
> it:
>
> I would like to find out if any of us are NOT lawyers, doctors or
> dentists. Not that it is wrong to be one of the above but I am tired of
> hearing the same old "toys of the rich" refrain. None of my personal
> acquaintances with Leicas are lawyers, doctors or dentists. As a matter
> of fact, I know quite a few lawyers, doctors and dentists, and the most
> of them own Canon Rebels.
>
> I am a full time house husband right now and previously was, and will be
> again, an automotive mechanic.
>
> And you?
>
> John Collier
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> ([Leica] The notta thread)