Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I've always thought of Hamilton's stuff as bad photography of young girls to perk the interest of old men. Allan On Saturday, April 20, 2002, at 09:05 AM, brad daly wrote: > rob: > >> Call me anal retentive, then. I've always despised the vaseline lens >> nude as >> one of the lowest possible forms of one-handed photography. The fact >> the >> subjects are kids just makes it even more exploitative, IMO. >> >> It's just bad, totally commercial photography without an ounce of >> integrity >> or style. I think that qualifies it as porn. > > i don't think it qualifies as porn. i think it qualifies simply as > "bad". > > > -- > brad daly > bwdaly@bigfatpipe.net > http://www.bigfatpipe.net/~bwdaly > http://www.bigfatpipe.net/~bwdaly/paw.html > > "America sells everything with sex and then recoils when presented with > the realities of natural process." > --Jock Sturges > > "War, what is it good for? It's good for business." > --Billy Bragg > > All my family problems disappeared overnight. > We're all takin' Zoloft, and everything is fine. > My sister's teen angst just flew out the window. > Momma's so happy, she laughs all the time. > --Patterson Hood > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html