Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: colleen - now: David Hamilton
From: Allan Wafkowski <allan@sohogurus.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 10:06:52 -0400

I've always thought of Hamilton's stuff as bad photography of young 
girls to perk the interest of old men.

Allan


On Saturday, April 20, 2002, at 09:05 AM, brad daly wrote:
> rob:
>
>> Call me anal retentive, then. I've always despised the vaseline lens 
>> nude as
>> one of the lowest possible forms of one-handed photography. The fact 
>> the
>> subjects are kids just makes it even more exploitative, IMO.
>>
>> It's just bad, totally commercial photography without an ounce of 
>> integrity
>> or style. I think that qualifies it as porn.
>
> i don't think it qualifies as porn.  i think it qualifies simply as 
> "bad".
>
>
> --
> brad daly	
> bwdaly@bigfatpipe.net	
> http://www.bigfatpipe.net/~bwdaly
> http://www.bigfatpipe.net/~bwdaly/paw.html
>
> "America sells everything with sex and then recoils when presented with 
> the realities of natural process."
> 	--Jock Sturges
>
> "War, what is it good for?  It's good for business."
> 	--Billy Bragg
>
> All my family problems disappeared overnight.
> We're all takin' Zoloft, and everything is fine.
> My sister's teen angst just flew out the window.
> Momma's so happy, she laughs all the time.
> 	--Patterson Hood
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "\(SonC\) Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: colleen - now: David Hamilton)