Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I had it and the sold it. I like it simply for the esthetics of the lens itself. I found the aperture ring in the wrong place most of the time. I loved the lens hood. As I'm sure most of us do - I remember my great pics for the camera and lens they were taken with - the bokeh of the 50/2.8 is in my opinion very pleasing. ernie On 4/13/02 5:42 PM, "Jeffery L. Smith" <jsmith45@bellsouth.net> wrote: > Before we all got derailed, the talk was of the 50mm Elmar (new > version). Very few folks ever talk about this lens. I have mine 90% > collapsed on a Bessa-T most of the time, and on an M3 some of the time. > What do y'all think about this lens? Mine seems to have very nice > contrast and is capable of transmitting rich, saturated colors. I'm not > too sure of its sharpness simply because the subject matter has > been...soft. > > Anyone on the LUG use the new version of the collapsible Elmar with > regularity? I bought it primarily because of its diminutive price and > diminutive size. I was surprised by its nice capabilities. > > Jeffery Smith > New Orleans, LA > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- http://home.twcny.rr.com/nitka - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html