Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] leica 35-70 /2.8
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 07:42:32 +0200
References: <MBBBJHIBKCKEAEOKKBPOKEFGDDAA.bdcolen@earthlink.net> <3CAB7FA4.B58DBB08@d2.com>

Feli,

Then you are depriving yourself of great lenses like the 100mm Apo Macro, which in
my view is reason enough to get into Leica SLR. So the 35-50mm 2.8 is too
expensive, big deal--I have the 4/35-70mm which is also excellent, costs much
less, and thanks to the bright viewfinder of the R8 does not feel too slow.

Nathan

Feliciano di Giorgio wrote:

> Let's put it like this. One of the biggest reasons why I don't own a
> Leica
> SLR is that this lens (35-70) costs $6000. That is if you can find one.
> I'm sure it is one heck of apiece of glass, but at 5 times the price of
> the equivilant Nikon, which isn't exactly a piece of junk, it's just
> plain silly.
>
> feli

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
mobile: +41 78 732 1430

Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw2002.htm
General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] leica 35-70 /2.8)
Message from Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com> (Re: [Leica] leica 35-70 /2.8)