Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: the fling is over/my search has ended
From: Ken Wilcox <>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 21:36:07 -0500
References: <>

That's where mine went. If I hadn't hassled them by phone I never would 
have gotten back the roll they ruined.

Ken Wilcox

At 06:27 PM 03/31/2002, you wrote:
>The only thing I can think of as to why that might be is that I use the 
>Fair Lawn, NJ lab. It's been there for 30 years, at least, and they do a 
>lot of pro work from NYC. The mailers I have have Fair Lawn's address 
>pre-printed. I believe some require you to put in the address. If so, I'd 
>put in the Fair Lawn address. In 20 years, they have never destroyed any 
>of my film.
>On Sunday, March 31, 2002, at 04:05 PM, Ken Wilcox wrote:
>>I'm envious of your proximity. I shot a couple of rolls last summer, 
>>using it for the first time in several years. Kodalux sent the first back 
>>2 and half months later with dirt stuck all over it. They lost the second one.
>>Ken Wilcox
>>At 03:25 PM 03/31/2002, you wrote:
>>>For me, I drive down to the Kodak processing plant, drop the film off, 
>>>and pick it up the next day. Never had a roll badly developed. For 
>>>others, It's a matter of buying a Kodak mailer and sending it out. I've 
>>>heard people say they received terrible processing from Kodak. I don't 
>>>know how to answer them; I've never, never had even one slide poorly processed.
>>>On Sunday, March 31, 2002, at 11:49 AM, wrote:
>>>>How difficult is it to get a roll of Kodachome 64 developed?
>>>To unsubscribe, see
>>Ken Wilcox
>>To unsubscribe, see
>To unsubscribe, see

- ------------------------
Ken Wilcox

- --
To unsubscribe, see

In reply to: Message from Ken Wilcox <> ([Leica] Re: the fling is over/my search has ended)