Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That's where mine went. If I hadn't hassled them by phone I never would have gotten back the roll they ruined. Ken Wilcox At 06:27 PM 03/31/2002, you wrote: >The only thing I can think of as to why that might be is that I use the >Fair Lawn, NJ lab. It's been there for 30 years, at least, and they do a >lot of pro work from NYC. The mailers I have have Fair Lawn's address >pre-printed. I believe some require you to put in the address. If so, I'd >put in the Fair Lawn address. In 20 years, they have never destroyed any >of my film. > >Allan > > >On Sunday, March 31, 2002, at 04:05 PM, Ken Wilcox wrote: >>I'm envious of your proximity. I shot a couple of rolls last summer, >>using it for the first time in several years. Kodalux sent the first back >>2 and half months later with dirt stuck all over it. They lost the second one. >> >>Ken Wilcox >> >> >>At 03:25 PM 03/31/2002, you wrote: >>>For me, I drive down to the Kodak processing plant, drop the film off, >>>and pick it up the next day. Never had a roll badly developed. For >>>others, It's a matter of buying a Kodak mailer and sending it out. I've >>>heard people say they received terrible processing from Kodak. I don't >>>know how to answer them; I've never, never had even one slide poorly processed. >>> >>>Allan >>> >>> >>>On Sunday, March 31, 2002, at 11:49 AM, rclompus@cox.net wrote: >>>> >>>>How difficult is it to get a roll of Kodachome 64 developed? >>> >>>-- >>>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >> >>------------------------ >>Ken Wilcox >>klw.51(at)comcast.net >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - ------------------------ Ken Wilcox klw.51(at)comcast.net - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html