Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Or...Leica lenses aren't *that* good. In fact, the Nikon 60 2.8 macro is a pretty amazing lens. B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of BOB KRAMER Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:57 AM To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' Subject: RE: [Leica] Macro - Leica R vs Nikon, was Eric's PAW week 13 If you had taken two identical shots from the same angle at the same time, and we were looking at original slides on a light table, it might be an interesting exercise to compare the two brands. But looking at low res jpegs on the internet, who could possibly tell? Nikon lenses aren't *that* bad! ;-) BK > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Hemenway [mailto:jim@hemenway.com] > Subject: [Leica] Macro - Leica R vs Nikon, was Eric's PAW week 13 > > > > Guess which one was taken with the Leica-R 60mm Macro? > > http://www.hemenway.com/pages/Day%20Lily.htm > > http://www.hemenway.com/DayLily.jpg > > > Jim > Photo site: > http://www.hemenway.com > > -------------- > BOB KRAMER <BobKramer@COOPERCARRY.com> > >Can't imagine why someone on a leica list would say that. > There are a > >couple of pretty marvelous macro lenses in the R lineup, you know. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html