Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The first one of these is the best, but the other two seem to be a little bit overexposed - when you give Neopan 1600 too much light, it starts acting like Tri-X, and the midtones mush together. Neopan wants less light for its theatrical effect. Dante > Good grief, Eric, don't you ever shave your feet?! They may be dog-free, > but there seems to be some other sort of hairy beast in the room. ;-) > > I think the main one is by far the best. The way I wish all my B&W > portraits would turn out. Clean, with the eyes in perfect focus. Is that > a piece of lint above the spoon? If it is, get that fuzz offa there. > > Jeffery > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Eric > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:35 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: [Leica] Eric's PAW week 13 > > > Week #13 is up: > > http://canid.com/paw02.html > > Neopan 1600, Xtol 1:3. > > This week has been certified as being 100% dog free. :) > > > Eric > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - ------------ Dante Stella http://www.dantestella.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html