Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: dMax and Dyanmic range - scanners
From: John Brownlow <lists@johnbrownlow.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 11:09:10 -0500

On 3/26/02 9:35 AM, "Jim Hemenway" <jim@hemenway.com> wrote:

> Austin & John:
> 
> What do scanner manufacturers mean when they say that their devices have
> a high DMAX?
> 
> Are they claiming a high dynamic range, yet use the term DMAX?

Well, there's a very good question with a very surprising answer.

What scanner manufacturers *actually* mean by Dmax is that the A/D
converters in their machines capture so many bits of information.

For example, a scanner which can capture 12 bits is capable of representing
4096 distinct shades of gray (ignoring color for the moment). It's
*theoretical* dynamic range is therefore

    log10(4096) - log10(1)

Which is 3 and a bit (sorry don't have slide rule handy)

Therefore the *only* thing most scanner manufacturer's Dmax figures tell you
is how many bits they capture. They tell you nothing *at all* about the
photo/mechanical/optical qualities of the scanner or its s/n ratio as a
physical system. They are *never measured*. They are just derived from the
number of bits of information the scanner returns for each pixel.

- -- 
John Brownlow

http://www.pinkheadedbug.com

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Michael Abbott" <lists@mabot.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: dMax and Dyanmic range - scanners)