Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Joe, mine at least brings up the 35MM framelines on a M6 72 classic. I solve that problem with the M3 and a 28MM finder. As to the image degradation, it is real, but it isn't earthshakingly bad either. My earlier post suggesting you look at the Canon 28mm F3.5 from the 1950's was assuming you would be using the lens stopped down somewhat, in which case the Minolta is a fine performer. However, use the flaw as a bargaining point! If it doesn't have the hood use that as a bargaining point! Point out that 40.5 filters and accessories aren't usually readily available. However, if you are one to suffer guilt about this image could have been better: or you frequently shoot at 2.8 or larger, then you should save the money and proceed directly to either the current Elmarit or Summicron. Especially if you shoot 100 speed film you will notice the difference in the new glass versus the old. My general recommendation is the new Leica glass is without peer and if you can do without until you can afford it that is the way to go. However, if you shoot fast film and/or shoot at 5.6 or smaller most of the time, the old glass can usually give a good image that will hold up pretty well compared to the new designs. The major exception would be in high flare situations in which case go directly to the new glass. Don dorysrus@mindspring.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html