Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Dante, > 2. The suggestion (which has even popped up in this thread) that "I don't > need a lawyer; I can read," (i.e., lawyers perform no societal > function) is > absurd. The need for lawyers (in a grand sense) is because of the, in my opinion, over complexity of our laws. This need is, in a large sense, self made, since, for the most part, lawyers write the laws. Unlike the need for doctors, who do not make up the illnesses. I am in no way suggesting that lawyers can't and don't serve a very useful function...but the need is WAY to overbearing, in my opinion. A somewhat intelligent person should be able to take care of %99 of the legal issues one needs to take care of. > The proliferation of personal-injury lawyers is a testament to > society's utter lack of self-reliance and dependence on others to > absolve it > of its own carelessness. If there weren't so many personal injury lawyers looking for personal injury cases, I don't believe there would be so many personal injury cases. Some personal injury cases are entirely legitimate, but a large number of the ones I hear about (and know first hand) are just absurd, and would not go anywhere unless some unscrupulous lawyer got involved. The sad part is, these lawyers get companies to pay up, though their claims are a joke, because the cost of litigating, and the POTENTIAL for large awards is there. This was in no way meant to offend anyone, but is simply my personal view on the subject. Austin - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html