Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: Digital darkroom - when isn't it photography?
From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 17:05:04 -0800
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020324124629.0e890608@pop.alink.net>

I figured that this would get folks all worked up...

:)

Jim


At 04:46 PM 3/24/2002 -0500, Pete Su wrote:
>Jim Brick said:
>>  Once in Photoshop, well, the urge is there and 99% of the time, the 
>> print you are printing has been modified to where it is not 
>> representative of the original scene.
>
>Why come to this conclusion outright? I think there are a lot of people 
>doing digital "art" or whatever that fit this profile (Capronigo comes to 
>mind), but I think 99% of the people just doing digital printing are just 
>using Photoshop to do the same things you do in the darkroom (masking, 
>balancing light, contrast control, a bit of sharpening).
>
>Pete

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] Re: Digital darkroom - when isn't it photography?)