Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2002/03/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Digital darkroom - when isn't it photography?
From: "Craig Roberts" <crgrbrts@netzero.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 18:19:59 -0500
References: <001501c1d368$80212580$633f4d18@gv.shawcable.net> <20020324101044-r01050000-754B7004-3F52-11D6-996A-003065C7DF66-1013-010c@10.0.1.27> <5.1.0.14.2.20020324124629.0e890608@pop.alink.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20020324175214.02bbe3c0@infoave.net>
Joseph confessed: "In Photoshop I removed the newspaper that was still in
the driveway. Was that unethical?"
As a journalist, I'd say that removing the newspaper digitally is not
unethical. Digitally rewriting the lead headline is questionable, however
(unless the newspaper is the Washington Times). :-)
Craig
down in D.C.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Digital darkroom - when isn't it photography?)
Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@idea-processing.com> ([Leica] Digital darkroom - when isn't it photography?)
Message from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] Re: Digital darkroom - when isn't it photography?)
Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Digital darkroom - when isn't it photography?)