Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2002/03/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Digital darkroom - when isn't it photography?
From: "Craig Roberts" <email@example.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 18:19:59 -0500
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20020324101044-r01050000-754B7004-3F52-11D6-996A-003065C7DF66email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Joseph confessed: "In Photoshop I removed the newspaper that was still in
the driveway. Was that unethical?"
As a journalist, I'd say that removing the newspaper digitally is not
unethical. Digitally rewriting the lead headline is questionable, however
(unless the newspaper is the Washington Times). :-)
down in D.C.
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from Ted Grant <firstname.lastname@example.org> (Re: [Leica] Digital darkroom - when isn't it photography?)
Message from Adam Bridge <email@example.com> ([Leica] Digital darkroom - when isn't it photography?)
Message from Jim Brick <firstname.lastname@example.org> ([Leica] Re: Digital darkroom - when isn't it photography?)
Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Digital darkroom - when isn't it photography?)