Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] What does the 75 Summilux really look like?
From: Sam Carleton <scarleton@miltonstreet.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:58:51 -0500
References: <MBBBJHIBKCKEAEOKKBPOKEJJDAAA.bdcolen@earthlink.net>

"B. D. Colen" wrote:

[snip]
> But don't worry about photos of it. 
[snip]

BD,

You make it sound like I am up nights worring about what the 75 looks
like on a camera and cannot make up my mind on whether or not I want one
until I see what it looks like on a M.  I am not, before I ever made the
posting, I had desided that the 75 was/is the right lens for me.  I was
simply WONDERING what it might look like.  Two people have provided
images of the lens on a body, which was very nice and exactly what I was
wanting to know.  

If I had the money right now, I would have one on order, when I do get
the money, I am going to get the lens.  But this was a fact BEORE I ever
started this thread.

Sam
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] What does the 75 Summilux really look like?)