Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] 50/1.4 vs 75/1.4
From: "Ernest Nitka" <enitka@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:05:45 -0500

Austin - contact me off list if you get a chance

ernie
enitka@twcny.rr.com

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Austin
Franklin
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 8:55 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] 50/1.4 vs 75/1.4



> BUT I could use some advice about pros and cons of Summilux
> 50/1.4 v 75/1.4.
> I'm looking for the lens that can use wide open with relative ease of
> focusing on a .58 M    I am thinking of getting rid of my
> Noctilux and want
> something that will give me a pleasing out of focus area.  Any thoughts.

Hi Ernie,

With the .58, I don't believe you'll find the 75 easy to use, which is a
real shame.  I find the 75 the absolute best lense I've ever used, right
next to the Hasselblad 110/2.  I use the 75 and 35/1.4 as my "kit", and find
I am not wanting of any other lenses for over %95 of my work.

You don't think the Noctilux gives pleasing OOF areas?]

I have a 50/1.4 (it's as new, w/ box etc.) that I just never use, since I
mostly use the 75 and 35, and the other lense I have is the 24...so the 50
just sits at home...if you are interested in a partial trade towards your
Noctilux (if it's a current model), I'd be interested.  I would believe with
the .58 you'll be a lot happier with the 50 than with the 75...

Austin

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html