Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2002/03/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] what's the difference?
From: "Michael Gardner" <mlgardner99@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 20:19:04 -0500
References: <5.0.2.1.0.20020131211919.02e3a008@mail.chroniclenetworks.com> <002b01c1a9ce$7b9da290$ad466cd8@TELLURIUM> <20020130183526.22560.qmail@web9503.mail.yahoo.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020130155711.03959e88@pop.alink.net> <5.0.2.1.0.20020131211919.02e3a008@mail.chroniclenetworks.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020201095144.0395e510@pop.alink.net> <3C8E91F0.4A8F46DB@d2.com> <000d01c1ca23$341f09c0$78c20a44@hr.cox.net> <3C8E9E37.600B1E73@d2.com> <007f01c1ca2b$a20a40f0$0a3aa8c0@almond>
In 120 size, I shoot TX 400. Great tonal range, iso 400 and works like
Tri-X 35mm. TXP (iso 320) has the retouchable base, different tonal range -
not even the same film. For general MF pictorial work you want the TX 400.
Mike Gardner
> The film base on the 35mm film is the same. The ASA is also
> the same. The 120/220 and sheet film have the 320 ASA and a
> thicker acetate base. ref: select the tri-x at
> http://www.kodak.com/cgi-bin/webAlphPrListing.pl?letter=T
> Many people will shoot the 35mm film at ASA 320.
> Hope this helps, Bill Larsen
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com> (Re: [Leica] what's the difference?)
In reply to:
Message from Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com> ([Leica] what's the difference?)
Message from "Andrew Touchon" <atouchon@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] what's the difference?)
Message from Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com> (Re: [Leica] what's the difference?)
Message from "Will" <wlarsen@ocsnet.net> (Re: [Leica] what's the difference?)