Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Vs: [Leica] Re: price of art prints (was re: kyle's fine art)
From: "Raimo Korhonen" <raimo.m.korhonen@uusikaupunki.fi>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:27:02 +0100

Yeah - van Gogh never sold any paintings in his life.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho

- -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
Lähettäjä: Allan Wafkowski <allan@sohogurus.net>
Vastaanottaja: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Päivä: 12. maaliskuuta 2002 5:34
Aihe: [Leica] Re: price of art prints (was re: kyle's fine art)


<snip>
>Someone will ask, "Should van Gogh not have made a living from his art?" 
>I answer, "Van Gogh, yes, most artists, no."
>
>Allan
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com> (Re: Vs: [Leica] Re: price of art prints (was re: kyle's fine art))
Reply from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: Vs: [Leica] Re: price of art prints (was re: kyle's fine art))