RE: [Leica] 400 B&W

[BOB KRAMER <BobKramer@COOPERCARRY.com>]

B.D., what the hell are you talking about?????  I certainly didn't say or
even imply that chromogenic film wasn't "real".  Only that I couldn't tweak
exposure/development times with it to get varying contrast, which is
important to me.

Chromogenic film is real.  Not the point at all.

BK

> -----Original Message-----
> From: B. D. Colen [mailto:bdcolen@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 1:08 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] 400 B&W
> 
> 
> Guys, chromogenic film is as much real film as tab films, or 
> "real grain"
> films. If people are going to continue to play this "real" 
> not real game, in
> relation to film, digital prints, etc., then maybe we should 
> just say that
> Daguerreotypes are "real," and everything else is "not real?" 
> Makes just as
> much sense - maybe even more! ;-)
> 
> B. D.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of 
> BOB KRAMER
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:19 AM
> To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us'
> Subject: RE: [Leica] 400 B&W
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Rabiner [mailto:mark@markrabiner.com]
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] 400 B&W
> >
> > I like the control i have over real film (not chromegic)
> 
> This is the issue for me.  I can't stand the lack of 
> development control
> with the C41 B&W films.  I use the vuescan software and a 
> Minolta Dimage
> Scandual II, and the results with tab grain films are extremely good.
> 
> Bob Kramer
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html