Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Should the nameless stay nameless
From: "Jeffery Smith" <jsmith45@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 19:53:28 -0600

My favorite...Jersey Joe Walcott was Arnold Cream. Who could blame him? ;-)

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Brian Reid
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 7:33 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Should the nameless stay nameless
>
>
> Think about John Wayne.
> Wasn't the name on his birth certificate Marion Michael Morrison?
> Elton John was born Reginald Dwight.
> In the entertainment industry we know people by their stage names.
> Most of us use our real names as our stage names.
> For the past year, the LUG has been as much in the realm of entertainment
> than photography, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. There are other
> online communities for people who would rather talk about cam angles than
> Nazi propagandists.
>
> If anybody named LizzyEgg16 should ever show up on the LUG, well,
> that's my
> daughter, and I can see how she might want to hide. Maybe she'll
> change it
> to LizzyEgg17 to hide it from me.
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html