Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:28:25 -0500

Having corresponded off-list with Photo Phreak I would simply note that the
speculation about why Photo Phreak is posting this way, and what he is or
isn't, reminds me of the story about the blind man describing the
elephant.:-)

B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of George
Lottermoser
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:33 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless


JRFjr@compuserve.com (John R. Fulton Jr.)3/8/0212:09 PM

> I'm assuming that Mr/Ms/Mrs Photo Phreak is a photojournalist,
who
> covered Vietnam so it is not some young person. The name Photo
Phreak
> is 1960's oriented. Also the person is pretty knowledgeable
about the
> photo industry and Leicas.

and so the reputation of Photo Phreak grows beyond even his/hers
wildest dreams/nightmares.

Reputation by any other name - you got it whether you want it or
not.

George


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html