Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:56:21 -0500

Naw - Despite what people may think, I'm a registered Independent - although
I am proud to say that not once since casting my first vote in 1968 have I
voted for a Republican Presidential candidate. Which, of course, means I've
voted for a lot of losers. Including some who won.
:-)

B. D.
- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jim
Hemenway
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 12:02 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless



B.D. --- Basic Democrat?

Jim
http://www.hemenway.com


Brian Reid wrote:
>
 any of those is actually his real name.
>
> Anybody know what "B.D." stands for?
> (Anybody care? I don't).
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Karina Klaas" <shutterbug@iinet.net.au> (Re: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless)