Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] A Second Body
From: Simon WEMEL <swemel@cofidis.fr>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 15:47:54 +0100

M6 classic with 21/4 et 35/2 last pre-asph version
M2 with 50/2 et 2.8/90

Simon WEMEL
COFIDIS - DSI
Ingenieur Telecoms
Tel : 03.28.76.28.52
Fax : 03.28.76.28.59
E-mail : swemel@cofidis.fr

- -----Message d'origine-----
De:	Eric C [SMTP:eric.calderwood@btinternet.com]
Date:	jeudi 7 mars 2002 15:02
A:	leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Objet:	Re: [Leica] A Second Body



M6 0.85 and M3 


Eric



on 6/3/02 4:14 PM, Frank Filippone at red735i@earthlink.net wrote:

> I was wondering what might be the LUG's (multiple) opinion about choice of a
> second body, if you carry around 2 bodies....  For the sake of clarity,
> please note your primary body as well.  For those with many bodies (
> multiple Leica disorder?), I suggest you state your combinations of bodies
> that you use...
> 
> Examples:
> M2 + IIIC
> M6TTL .85  + M2
> M6 .72 + CL
> M3 + Bessa L
> 
> Or whatever you like...
> 
> My personal choice is 1 body... a M6TTL .72... 2 bodies is too much for my
> tourist style...
> 
> Frank Filippone
> red735i@earthlink.net
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html