Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sorry - This was meant to be off-list to Adam. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of B. D. Colen Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:39 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: PAW - week 10 - Allan - Caution: this week's PAW taken with a non-Leica camera Hmmmmm...Rollei 3.5 F? Interested in a Rollei 2.8 F? B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Adam Bridge Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:46 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: PAW - week 10 - Allan - Caution: this week's PAW taken with a non-Leica camera > Please visit my week 10 PAW: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/presentation.tcl?presentation_id=134579 > > This week I'm offering a series of six related images. I don't think of > any one as the main image, but all are an equal part of the series. > > Allan Of all the images you shared with us I like 10-3 "Flaking Paint" the best. Of the rest of the pool images (it's hard for me to see what appears to be a 50m pool in such bad shape) 10-1 seems the strongest. I know why you took the others, but I don't think they work very well. Even the converging lines in 10-1 don't quite do it for me. Perhaps if shot with deepest depth of field the sharper reflections in the water would be better? I'll be interested in what the rest of the folks say. Thank you! Adam - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html