Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Available PAW, week 9!
From: Marc Attinasi <marc@attinasi.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 18:16:17 -0800
References: <20020306003309.8CA903ED3@sitemail.everyone.net> <3C856F6A.3A758F57@markrabiner.com>

So, are you guys friends or is this rude response for real?

I hope the former, and this is all just jest.  I'd hate for PAW's to 
have to be qualified as EOS or non-EOS or whatever - they are all just 
pictures.

I like the truck shot - the main one, but then I'm partial to old nasty 
trucks.  There is a lot of dark gray in there, I like it - sort of a 
military tonality to it.

What f-stop did you use, BTW?


Mark Rabiner wrote:

>
>I think if someones going to have a damn Canon EOS shot on his paw it
>should be indicated as such in advance [OT] to those of us or are on the
>Leica users group with no interest in such things and can be saved the
>trouble of looking at it. It's not a rangefinder camera. 
>
Ouch!  A damn Canon EOS shot...now that's something to think about..

>
>But to be a bit harsh I'm going to have to say that "alternate" shots of
>the trucks with not the grill in focus but the windshield are in my
>opinion not alternates at all but obvious failures. 
>
Nice.  Obvious failures, how kind.

>[snip some other mean stuff]
>
Where have I been, I thought Mark was nicer than that.  Like I said, I 
hope you guys are friends :)

Naively yours,
- - marc

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from colin <noctilux@stealth.hell.com> ([Leica] Available PAW, week 9!)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] Available PAW, week 9!)