Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Robert Stevens PAW 9 Rejects The bad and the UGLY
From: "geebeespaw" <geebeespaw@btopenworld.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 23:21:19 -0000
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020305172941.02b8f598@pop.andara.com>

Rob

Bad link. Dramatic skies, strong shapes, not a reject in sight.

My PAW weeks 4,6 and 8 are with a Minilux. After what I paid for the M I
would have expected a difference in quality. If it's there I can't see it
either on the web or the neg.



Graham
http://geebeephoto.com


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert G. Stevens" <robsteve@hfx.andara.com>
To: <leica@topica.com>; <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>;
<PAW@topica.com>
Sent: 05 March 2002 21:33
Subject: [Leica] Robert Stevens PAW 9 Rejects The bad and the UGLY


>   Hi all:
>
> A few comments have been made about editing my work.  I purposely did not
> post an alternate, because  I thought they were sub standard or similar to
> what I have already shown in my PAWS.  This is why I will call them my
> rejects rather than alternates.  Incidentally, the rejects include a
> picture of how the burned Lunenburg Church looks today.  The link to the
> rejects is below:
>
> http://home.istar.ca/~robsteve/photography/PAW2002/wk9Rejects.htm
>
> Regards,
>
> Robert
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Robert G. Stevens" <robsteve@hfx.andara.com> ([Leica] Robert Stevens PAW 9 Rejects The bad and the UGLY)