Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I tried this and found no difference but you may find different. Jem - ----- Original Message ----- From: <ned@kajabbi.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:31 AM Subject: [Leica] RE: [Leica] Erwin Puts' M7 report > If you are having a continual problem with viewfinder glare, there is a > gentleman in Switzerland that has the answer. A simple filter that fit over > the viewfinder window. It works wonders yet does not darken the finder in > very low light. H makes two other very useful items for your Ms. All worth > buying!! You can find him on E-bay. > Kajabbi > > -- Original Message -- > > > > >> > 2. IF the M7 coating was changed to reduce reflection, then Leica has > >> > finally tacitly acknowledged that the M6 was/is DEFECTIVE. So > >> the question > >> > then is - aren't we all entitled to have the M7 fix applied to > >> our M6s at no > >> > charge? > >> > >> Gee - if an automobile manufacturer puts on anti-lock breaks > >> which work better > >> does that make previous car defective? > >> > >> I don't think so. > > > >"Work better" is entirely different than not work reliably. The M6 > >viewfinder does have a problem, that does not exist in older incarnations > >of > >Leica M cameras. > > > >> Sheesh - give me a break. > > > >Yuk Yuk...would that be an anti-lock break ;-) > > > >Austin > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html