Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Erwin - Thank you for forthright response to my questions. While I certainly disagree that they were an "invasion of privacy," you were certainly under no obligation of any kind to answer them. Clearly, from your answers, you function as independently as any other reviewer of photographic equipment, and more independently than quite a few. ;-) As far as I'm concerned, this is now a dead issue. So I will eat my breakfast of crow, and hope that the LUG returns to business as usual. B. D. Colen - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Erwin Puts Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 5:50 AM To: LUG Subject: [Leica] Leicagate Jim's account of his relationship with Alpa closely resembles mine with Leica. While I do not feel in any way obliged to answer B.D. questions, which in my view are crossing the line of the privacy of the individual, I will present here my position. I am an independant business consultant since 10 years (before that I was a university researcher/teacher, and a high ranking governement official), who works at the moment for three Dutch companies, all with a yearly turnover of several billion dollars. My area of expertise is reengineering legacy software and business process analysis. My company is a one-person company and I earn all of my money with these activities. My second area of activities is photography, where I am as an independent journalist enrolled as technical editor to one of the bigger Dutch photomagazines. My contacts in the photoindustry are based here. I am taking pictures too and with the combination of picture taking and photojournalism I write numerous articles about the technical aspects photography for several European magazines. I am involved in this area of activities for over ten years and have written by now I think about a hundred artices, some of which are Leica related. I started using and writing about Leica 16 years ago as a hobby. As my testreports in the magazines about Leica equipment (done fully independent from Leica) became quite popular, I felt the need to delve deeper into the Leica world and contacted the Dutch distributor. He provides me with all the equipment I need for testing. I sign off a paper and return all equipment after use. I do not get any product for free, nor do I get any favours. Every adjustment to my own cameras or lenses is paid for by me as a normal repair service. If I want to buy a Leica lens or body I buy it in Holland and pay the normal price. All my lenses and the one M6 I own now have been paid for by me. I finance this with the fees I get from the articles I publish, which are not Leica related in many cases. Obviously I visist the Solms factory regularly. From my home in Holland to Solms is a distance of about 300 miles and when I travel to Solms I always take a hotel. I travel by car (my own), pay for my own gasoline and pay for the hotel. I have never been in an hotel paid for me by Leica. The one visit I made to Portugal (by airplane) was paid for by me, including the hotel. Leica is of course aware of my actions as a journalist and my reports and analyses about leica products and do support this with providing information. This is not unique: all writers about leica get this info: Brian Bower I have met in Soms several times and he is given the same info as I get. And I know that every journalist in Solms can talk to whomever he wants about whatever topic. There is a free flow of information and that is it. I have never received from Leica any gift or camera or lens or whatever material product (excepting the leica calendar which I receive free, as all journalists get one for free). I would be very stupid and so would be Leica, if the relationship would be jeopardized if they would try to influence me or if I would let myself be influenced in my opinions by giving/accepting gifts. I am surprised that B.D. and others are so naive as to assume that opinions and testreports can be 'bought'. Maybe their view reflects on their own attitude in these matters. Leica is a very responsible company and so am I and so are most companies I deal with. I do not think tat multi-billion dollar companies would rely on experts who are not reliable or responsible. I know that operating in the public domain and having acquired a certain status, has its responsibilities and makes you vulnerable to the kind of suspicion of which B.D's list is the latest incarnation. All research activities and time invested in doing the research, accumulating the facts and reporting on the findings are done in my own free time. My website is paid for by me, the Newsletters are free and done in my spare time. I am aware that I make mistakes, that I do not know everything about leica and that I sometimes change my mind as most thoughtful people do, when they are confronted with new evidence or new insights. I am also aware that there are some who have become almost personal enemies and will never fail to point to every inconsistency in every sentence or opinion that I have written and who challenge my integrity and expertise on every possible occasion. In their place I would try to do something more constructive than flogging a hrse that is in their view already dead. I know from thousands of emails and personal contacts that my views and opinions are valued as a reliable guide for buying decisions for leica equipment and I do know that my research findings into the ultimate Leica quality are appreciated by many. Leica knows this too: when people talk about Leica, my name pops up regularly. The converse is happening: because I know that my position would be untenable if I would let me be influenced by Leica PR or if I would ask favours from Leica that might even in the remotest way question my independence, I am lost. So I would be a complete asshole if I would let this happen even in the slighest way. I often disagree with Leica: I am not convinced of the optical quality of many R-lenses. I have written about that in my book and on my website. I am not convinced of the quality of several M-lenses. The same goes for the bodies: I have my remarks and comments. That is known by Leica: that has never limited their cooperation, nor have they ever tried to influence my views. In fact they know and do appreciate that I have independent views and can back it up with facts and figures and yes, pictures too. It is in their own best interest to get independent and reliable and fact based feedback on their products. Do you really assume that Leica wants only blind and uncritical confirmation about their own achievements. How naive can you get! There is nothing in my M7 report or for that matter in my lens reports, that is not supported by experience, measured or calculated facts (I made a mistake in the calculation of the speed of the shutter curtains: it is 7 km/hour, not 70 km!) and I always make a careful distinction in presenting my own views and opinions and describing facts. Leica are justifiable proud of their products and achievements and very well capable of profiling their products as they seem fit. They really do not need to 'bribe' some Dutch guy to become their parrot. Erwin - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html