Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] PAW fakery - would 'ya know it ?
From: Nathan Wajsman <>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:16:28 +0100
References: <>


The spiritual father of the PAW project, Kyle Cassidy, has never specified that
Leica be the exclusive camera, although of course the assumption is that it will
be the prevalent brand, given the nature of this list. Since starting my own PAW
at the beginning of 2001, I have posted pictures taken with Rollei 35, Fuji and
Rollei medium format, and of course Leica--mostly the latter, simply because
that is what I use most. But there is no equipment restriction on your PAWs, so
just post away!


eric korenman wrote:

> Ok - I am a listserv lurker leica luster (LLLL?) who currently shoots with a
> contax G2. The arrival of the M7 has me seriously thinking about plunging
> in.
> I have read the posts, admired the PAWs for about 2 years now.
> Green with envy, I have started to wonder--
>   Would you know it if someone posted PAWs NOT shot with a Leica?
>   Has this happened?
> Just curious,
> Eric
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> --
> To unsubscribe, see

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland


General photo site:

- --
To unsubscribe, see

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <> (Re: [Leica] PAW fakery - would 'ya know it ?)
In reply to: Message from "eric korenman" <> ([Leica] PAW fakery - would 'ya know it ?)