Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Erwin Puts' M7 report
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:42:46 -0500

> > 2. IF the M7 coating was changed to reduce reflection, then Leica has
> > finally tacitly acknowledged that the M6 was/is DEFECTIVE. So
> the question
> > then is - aren't we all entitled to have the M7 fix applied to
> our M6s at no
> > charge?
>
> Gee - if an automobile manufacturer puts on anti-lock breaks
> which work better
> does that make previous car defective?
>
> I don't think so.

"Work better" is entirely different than not work reliably.  The M6
viewfinder does have a problem, that does not exist in older incarnations of
Leica M cameras.

> Sheesh - give me a break.

Yuk Yuk...would that be an anti-lock break ;-)

Austin

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html