Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 2/24/02 at 4:36 PM, bdcolen@earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) thoughtfully wrote: > 2. IF the M7 coating was changed to reduce reflection, then Leica has > finally tacitly acknowledged that the M6 was/is DEFECTIVE. So the question > then is - aren't we all entitled to have the M7 fix applied to our M6s at no > charge? Gee - if an automobile manufacturer puts on anti-lock breaks which work better does that make previous car defective? I don't think so. Geesh - with your point of view there would be no incentive for any manufactuer to improve a product since it will always be "defective" in some way and require a new one to replace. Sheesh - give me a break. Adam - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html