Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] P&S cameras and Canon L glass compared to Leica
From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 14:39:26 -0800
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020222214545.04b42be0@pop.andara.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020223003739.04b64de8@pop.andara.com>

I picked up a 35-350mm lens several weeks ago. It's a great general purpose
lens. I Just wish it was a f2.8 to f4 with IS. But heck, who am I to
complain. 
 Slobodan Dimitrov


"Robert G. Stevens" wrote:
> 
> Marc:
> 
> I got the Canon lens at half price from Canon Canada.  It was new in the
> box and never opened.  In a few weeks the IS lens was coming, so they
> offered it to me at a really cheap price rather than have it collect dust
> in their wharehouse.  I was actually asking the rep to find me a Canon
> 400mm f5.6 L.
> 
> I sold the Canon lens this fall for about what I paid for it two years age.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Robert
> 
> At 08:09 PM 2/22/2002 -0800, Marc Attinasi wrote:
> >Robert G. Stevens wrote:
> >
> >>[snip]
> >>I had the Canon Eos 400mm 2.8.  It was the version prior to the IS
> >>lens.  I also have the Leica 400mm f2.8.
> >
> >This is just depressing.  I do not think that anyone should be allowed to
> >own a Canon 400mm f2.8, let alone a Leica 400mm f2.8 - if others can have
> >them, why can't I? It's just not right. What an unjust world.
> >
> >Covetously, Enviously Yours,
> >- marc
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Robert G. Stevens" <robsteve@hfx.andara.com> (Re: [Leica] P&S cameras and Canon L glass compared to Leica)
Message from "Robert G. Stevens" <robsteve@hfx.andara.com> (Re: [Leica] P&S cameras and Canon L glass compared to Leica)