Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I picked up a 35-350mm lens several weeks ago. It's a great general purpose lens. I Just wish it was a f2.8 to f4 with IS. But heck, who am I to complain. Slobodan Dimitrov "Robert G. Stevens" wrote: > > Marc: > > I got the Canon lens at half price from Canon Canada. It was new in the > box and never opened. In a few weeks the IS lens was coming, so they > offered it to me at a really cheap price rather than have it collect dust > in their wharehouse. I was actually asking the rep to find me a Canon > 400mm f5.6 L. > > I sold the Canon lens this fall for about what I paid for it two years age. > > Regards, > > Robert > > At 08:09 PM 2/22/2002 -0800, Marc Attinasi wrote: > >Robert G. Stevens wrote: > > > >>[snip] > >>I had the Canon Eos 400mm 2.8. It was the version prior to the IS > >>lens. I also have the Leica 400mm f2.8. > > > >This is just depressing. I do not think that anyone should be allowed to > >own a Canon 400mm f2.8, let alone a Leica 400mm f2.8 - if others can have > >them, why can't I? It's just not right. What an unjust world. > > > >Covetously, Enviously Yours, > >- marc > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html