Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] The M7 (again!)
From: Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:15:21 -0600
References: <000c01c1b980$7fcc9170$295119d0@blue> <3C72BBB4.7060109@istate.net> <007c01c1b98d$08328360$ad466cd8@TELLURIUM>

I knew the point. My images were not in focus. Must be something wrong 
with my computer. This was the reason for my statement. Mine came up 
with no DOF .  duh.....duh.......................................duh.

Tim Atherton wrote:

>>I did not see much of any DOF in either picture
>>
>
>Errr duh... isn't that the point? He prefers to have more control over depth
>of field, as these images clearly show.
>
>you can either have a lot or a little/no depth of field (and anywhere in
>between). Having control over it means you can chose which you want - an
>option aperture prioroty allows yo to do easily.
>
>Tim A
>
>>Mark Cohen wrote:
>>
>>>I shoot mine in aperature priority.. I prefer to have more controll over
>>>my dof then going with shutter priority.
>>>
>>>http://www.creativephoto.com/WomenAndChild.html
>>>
>>>http://www.creativephoto.com/YowWoman.html
>>>
>>>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Tim Atherton" <tim@KairosPhoto.com> (Re: [Leica] The M7 (again!))
In reply to: Message from "Mark Cohen" <markc@binaryfaith.com> (RE: [Leica] The M7 (again!))
Message from Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net> (Re: [Leica] The M7 (again!))
Message from "Tim Atherton" <tim@KairosPhoto.com> (Re: [Leica] The M7 (again!))