Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]the dilemma! the tortured incertainty! i have exactly the same problem except with the 'lux variety of the 35. at first, i thought it would be a slam dunk in favor of the new ASPH, which truly is an astonishingly good performer. however, examination of photos i made with the pre-asph 35 'lux do show a strong character which appeals very much to me. and at its center, that old 61 vintage (same as me) is pretty damned good. and as you say, the older 35s really are of microscopic dimensions. i think i've resolved to keep them both. :-( - -rei > From: Henry Ting <henryting10@yahoo.com> > > I just got the new 35 ASPH, now together with the pre > ASPH version, I have 2 35 crons, and I have a hard > time deciding which to keep. > The pre-version is smaller and lighter (150 gm) and > the ASPH version is bigger and weighs (250 gm). To me, > the ASPH version is slighter better in pictorial > quality, but not by much when I examine prints in > 8x10. The newest and the greatest is tempting, but my > pre-asph version is no slough and being the smallest, > lightest lens, its a perfect match to the Leica M. > What do you guys think ? I only want to keep one. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html