Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That was my rationale, but now after having bought the new version, I'm not too sure. - --- Sam Carleton <scarleton@miltonstreet.com> wrote: > One would think that if you just spent money to buy > the ASPH, you would > unload the older lens. > > Henry Ting wrote: > > > > I just got the new 35 ASPH, now together with the > pre > > ASPH version, I have 2 35 crons, and I have a hard > > time deciding which to keep. > > The pre-version is smaller and lighter (150 gm) > and > > the ASPH version is bigger and weighs (250 gm). To > me, > > the ASPH version is slighter better in pictorial > > quality, but not by much when I examine prints in > > 8x10. The newest and the greatest is tempting, but > my > > pre-asph version is no slough and being the > smallest, > > lightest lens, its a perfect match to the Leica M. > > What do you guys think ? I only want to keep one. > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games > > http://sports.yahoo.com > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html