Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> From: Sam Carleton <scarleton@miltonstreet.com> > > Any thoughts on if there is going to be a f/2.8 version of this lens? > > Is my impression correct that f/3,4 is exactly one half stop between > f/2,8 and f/4? maybe they figure f2.8 would require goggles which is a turn-off for a lot of people. i'm amazed that one can find good condition late-model 135/2.8's in the $500 range. its reportedly a pretty good lens optically, though puts says: "miles behind the 3,4/135," which he considers "the best lens for the M." - -rei - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html