Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dans un courrier daté du 11/02/02 20:01:43 Paris, Madrid, Teresa299@aol.com a écrit : > In a message dated 2/10/02 4:37:16 PM, msmall@roanoke.infi.net writes: > > << I have replaced the long-service 2.8/50 Rodagon on my Beseler 23C with a > > 2.8/50 APO-Rodagon and the difference is quite noticeable. I am looking > > for a 2.8/40 or 4/40 APO-Componon for my Leitz V-35. And, for > > Medium-Format work I am currently using a 4/80 Rodagon but this will soon > > be upgraded to an APO-Rodagon or APO-Componon, whenever the killing frenzy > > on e-Bay lets me score one at less than Leica-like prices. > > > Marc >> > > Hi Marc, > > I'm interested in knowing what in particular is notably different in the > prints made from the 2.8 50 rodagon vs. the apo version. > > Thank you, > > > Kim > -- Hello guys , Is the Nikon 50 / 2.8 a good performer or would I get sharper resultls with another brand ? What about using my 50 Summicron with an adapter , if it exists ? To me this would be the ideal solution , to get the same quality level all along the chain . I have a durst 605 Color enlarger ( 24 x 36 ) Thanks Jo Goodtimes , France - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html