Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Enlarging lenses (slightly OT)
From: V8PWR@aol.com
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:54:45 EST

Dans un courrier daté du 11/02/02 20:01:43 Paris, Madrid, Teresa299@aol.com a 
écrit :

> In a message dated 2/10/02 4:37:16 PM, msmall@roanoke.infi.net writes:
>  
>  << I have replaced the long-service 2.8/50 Rodagon on my Beseler 23C with a
>  
>  2.8/50 APO-Rodagon and the difference is quite noticeable.  I am looking
>  
>  for a 2.8/40 or 4/40 APO-Componon for my Leitz V-35.  And, for
>  
>  Medium-Format work I am currently using a 4/80 Rodagon but this will soon
>  
>  be upgraded to an APO-Rodagon or APO-Componon, whenever the killing frenzy
>  
>  on e-Bay lets me score one at less than Leica-like prices.
>  
>  
>  Marc >>
>  
>  Hi Marc,
>  
>  I'm interested in knowing what in particular is notably different in the 
>  prints made from the 2.8 50 rodagon vs. the apo version.
>  
>  Thank you,
>  
>  
>  Kim
>  --

Hello guys ,
Is the Nikon 50 / 2.8 a good performer or would I get sharper resultls 
with another brand ?
What about using my 50 Summicron with an adapter , if it exists ?
To me this would be the ideal solution , to get the same quality level 
all along the chain .
I have a durst 605 Color enlarger ( 24 x 36 )
Thanks

Jo Goodtimes , France 
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Mike Durling" <durling@widomaker.com> (Re: [Leica] Enlarging lenses (slightly OT))