Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You are using $100 dollar words to say that you disagree with his world view. Exactly how much you disagree with his world view is difficult to say; but then, that is the reason one uses such language in the first place. You get to say that he is a good photographer but to imply, in jargon, that "something" is wrong. If you just said he was a poor photographer you would be laughed off the list but to subtly imply that his philosophy is unsound is a jab that is difficult to pin down. So if you disagree with his philosophy, then just say so and explain why. Do not cast unsupported assertions cloaked in fancy words that are charged with emotion but essentially meaningless. John Collier > From: Allan Wafkowski <allan@sohogurus.net> > > I'm learning how uncomprehending some people can be. > > allan > > > On Monday, February 11, 2002, at 06:11 PM, John Collier wrote: > >> You mean they are all sets with paid models!! I thought they were real >> poor >> people in bad straits! This is an amazing list. You learn the darndest >> things. >> >> John Collier >> >>> From: Allan Wafkowski <allan@sohogurus.net> >>> >>> I think you are correct. I have a difficult time getting past his >>> illustrative-propagandist style, coupled with his lame socialistic >>> philosophy. If I put all that aside, I very like his images. But that's >>> a lot to put aside. >>> >>> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >> > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html