Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] "Ideal format?"
From: Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:22:37 -0800
References: <3C65E406.1ABFC49D@metrocast.net> <009a01c1b28c$446c5340$64b960d1@alice>
 
At 6:40 PM -0500 2/10/02, Mike Durling wrote:
>I don't know why the 4:5 ratio is considered ideal.  I would much rather
>they make 8x12 paper!  Another thing that peeves me is that you can't get
>4x6 prints made from 120 6x9cm negatives.  They only print 120 in 4x5.
>Wider is better for me.
>
>Mike D

Hmmmm. My lab will make 4x6 prints machine prints from 6x9, or 4x11 
or 5x13.5 machine prints from Xpan negs, or 4x8 or 5x10 prints from 
6x12. All good values.

- -- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies: Reply from "Mike Durling" <durling@widomaker.com> (Re: [Leica] "Ideal format?")
 In reply to: Message from Phil Stiles <stiles@metrocast.net> ([Leica] "Ideal format?")
Message from "Mike Durling" <durling@widomaker.com> (Re: [Leica] "Ideal format?")