Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] "Ideal format?"
From: Henning Wulff <>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:22:37 -0800
References: <> <009a01c1b28c$446c5340$64b960d1@alice>

At 6:40 PM -0500 2/10/02, Mike Durling wrote:
>I don't know why the 4:5 ratio is considered ideal.  I would much rather
>they make 8x12 paper!  Another thing that peeves me is that you can't get
>4x6 prints made from 120 6x9cm negatives.  They only print 120 in 4x5.
>Wider is better for me.
>Mike D

Hmmmm. My lab will make 4x6 prints machine prints from 6x9, or 4x11 
or 5x13.5 machine prints from Xpan negs, or 4x8 or 5x10 prints from 
6x12. All good values.

- -- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  |[ ]|
- --
To unsubscribe, see

Replies: Reply from "Mike Durling" <> (Re: [Leica] "Ideal format?")
In reply to: Message from Phil Stiles <> ([Leica] "Ideal format?")
Message from "Mike Durling" <> (Re: [Leica] "Ideal format?")