Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 2/10/02 4:37:16 PM, msmall@roanoke.infi.net writes: << I have replaced the long-service 2.8/50 Rodagon on my Beseler 23C with a 2.8/50 APO-Rodagon and the difference is quite noticeable. I am looking for a 2.8/40 or 4/40 APO-Componon for my Leitz V-35. And, for Medium-Format work I am currently using a 4/80 Rodagon but this will soon be upgraded to an APO-Rodagon or APO-Componon, whenever the killing frenzy on e-Bay lets me score one at less than Leica-like prices. Marc >> Hi Marc, I'm interested in knowing what in particular is notably different in the prints made from the 2.8 50 rodagon vs. the apo version. Thank you, Kim - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html