Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Re: rude
From: "Jeffery Smith" <jsmith45@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 17:35:22 -0600

I don't know if spamming is the term, but I doubt that he would solicit my
input. I asked him why he felt that film was no longer a worthy medium (to
the point that images taken with it "suck").

Certainly no worse than the wars we have here on a regular basis.

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of George
> Lottermoser
> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 5:09 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Re: rude
>
>
> jsmith45@bellsouth.net (Jeffery Smith)2/3/0212:22 AM
>
> > I spammed him too.
>
>
> I don't wish start a war here but I truly do wish to understand.
>
> If we call the original fellow, who expressed his unsolicited and
> uninformed opinion to Pascal, rude. And I agree with the use of
> that label for his behavior.
> And we consider spam rude, And I agree with the use of that label
> for spamming.
> And then we spam the original guy - would it be fair to say we
> are rude as well?
>
> This whole affair seems a good example of how feuds, wars, mob
> behavior and conflicts begin and continue.
>
> I don't get it. Am I missing something here?
>
> George
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html