Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: rude
From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 15:09:08 -0800
References: <4C06843F-181F-11D6-876C-003065D4DE46@sohogurus.net> <593679.1012659323@[10.0.1.3]>

Brian Reid wrote:
>>> Imagine the effect if every reader of the LUG sent to
hogberg@hotmail.com a brief and polite message saying that Mr Hogberg's
comment on Pascal's picture was both rude and uninformed.<<<<<<<

Hi Brian,
I thought this might produce some interesting answers. ;-) My post to Mr.
Hogberg. ;-)
==================================
Dear Mr. Hogberg,
Sir, I think you might have over stated your opinion regarding the
following, however, I trust not so.

>This page stinks! Come in to the 21:st century. Today digital equipment
rules.<<<<

Really? And at what academic level of research did you determine this
statement of fact?   >> Today digital equipment rules.<<<<

Actually it would be great if you might pass along your research figures, as
I'm doing a study along those lines and it could be my good fortune, you are
someone of great importance regarding this digital phenomenon. Thank you.

So when I find a posting with such emphatic comment regarding digital, I
politely ask for your assistance to further my research. Are you on sir?

Be most good of you sir, if you would.
Thank you.
kindest regards,
Edwin James Grant III

 Ted Grant Photography Limited
www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Allan Wafkowski <allan@sohogurus.net> ([Leica] Re: rude)
Message from Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> (Re: [Leica] Re: rude)