Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]There is nothing insulting in what I said. In context of what was asked, I merely stated that there are those who do not appreciate the need for systematic photographic training. The head-shot under the tree can be nice, but that was not what was being asked. What was asked was whether there was something to be learned from that site. I said, yes. Some others became rabid in their disapproval. Disapproval of what? The style? They were not asked about the style, but whether there was anything to be learned. Why the emotions? It was a simple question. So what, Franklin gets insulted? There is nothing to be insulted about. Allan On Saturday, February 2, 2002, at 09:33 AM, Austin Franklin wrote: > >> I think that some of the hatred you hear >> vented against it is due to lack of formal training by the ventees. > > That's really quite insulting. No one said the lighting was bad at > all. I > believe most people don't like THAT "style" (I know I don't), and that > has > nothing to do with lack of formal training. BTW, I have had a LOT of > "formal" training (though NOT in "brown" portraiture), and have a LOT of > personal experience (none in "brown" portraiture). Neither of those > make or > break what I think of those shots. > > Austin > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html