Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dr Joseph, Way to go, and I like your honest opinion about the 'MMMMMMMMM'. Due to the limitations of the 'M', I am looking for an R6.2 from the 'new old stock'. If you can help locate one from your source, let me know. 'M' also follows 'R' you know ... there's an assortment of lens and accessories that I'll also need down the road. Email me privately. Regards Henry - --- Joseph Yao <joseph@yao.com> wrote: > Henry, > > The 'M'ore the 'M'errier.... This is what Leica 'M' > is all about! > > I was only helping you to come up with an excuse to > justify another Leica > purchase. ;-) > > Bests, > > Joseph > > > on 27/1/02 1:47 PM, Henry Ting at > henryting10@yahoo.com wrote: > > > Joseph, > > > > Your suggestion sounds good, but my problem is I > > already have 6 M bodies -- 2 M2s, 1 M3, 1 M4 and > 1M6 > > classic (.85) and 1 M6 TTL (.72). Now you're > telling > > me I need a M6 TTL (.58). But then I still would > have > > to eventually get the SLR for lens longer than > 135mm. > > I'd say Leica has this modular concept down to a > > science. Perhaps the real solution is to just sell > all > > my Ms and get into Leica Rs and be done with. Also > I > > surely won't be feeling like "robbing Peter to pay > > Paul". > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html