Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree 100% B.D. but I have that FL covered in a reflex. I find I prefer a 50 as my long rangefinder optic. 75 is not much further but 90 requires the use of my imagination to visualise properly. One is always slightly surprised by how it looks. My 90/2AA is my favourite long lens bar none, a stunning performer. However, I am interested in exploring higher speed lenses without spending major $$$. For inexplicable reasons, my darling spousal unit adores me and humours me no end; but even she has her limits... John Collier > From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> > > That's a move you may regret, John - There is no question that speed is not > only addictive, but often necessary, but there is a world of difference > between the reach and perspective of a 90 and a 50, and even the 90 and the > 75. > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html