Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I am very happy to be corrected, not that it changes my experience, but because it's neat to discuss actual M-camera use. Just for the record, I'm a Nikon and M user so, while I don't discount anyone else's experience(!), I do, myself, have the opportunity to see it from both sides. Although, probably obviously, I don't use these cameras interchangeably - despite what I've posted, I DO use the M6s for close, quiet work. (But still, I'm never unobtrusive.) While I wasn't responding to (or commenting on) street photography use, it's funny that BK mentions Garry Winogrand, as an example: >Go rent or borrow the PBS video where Winogrand is >shown shooting in the street with an M camera. He will be walking along, >and all of a sudden he quickly raises - almost jerks - the camera to his >eyes, fires, and lowers the camera back down in one motion. While I haven't seen the video (and would really like to), I did have a chance to watch Winogrand work one afternoon. He stood in the sun near a street corner in the middle of the sidewalk with the large 5th Avenue crowds going by and the Mwhatever (with Leicavit or winder, I forget) in front of his face while he just banged away. No stealth whatsoever. Then he moved to another corner. And yes, I know enough of his work to realize that much of it was done exactly as you describe. Different horses for different courses, maybe. I watched William Klein work one day, briefly, with a couple of Leica Rs, not far from the Winogrand episode. Interestingly, he (similarly) stood on a street corner with his back to the street and just banged away. I don't remember any motor but it clearly was VERY wide angle because the crowds were right on him, practically pushing him back into the street. Both of these guys were burning ALOT of film. And yes, I realize that these anecdotes prove nothing as a general rule, just thought I'd share them (two superb photographers with Leicas, eh?). I most certainly agree that the M is a >>non-threatening little camera<<, I just still suspect that the perceived threat is coming as much or more from the photographer as it is from the camera. I realize from everyone's response that I'm somewhat alone in that assessment (an assessment which I feel strongly about), and I find that interesting enough to (re)question my working habits. It's entirely possible that I'M the threat (not a joke), and that gets back to cultural norms: New Yorker working in West Hicktown, California. Thanks alot, - ---Peter - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html