Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Kodachrome lab in Northern California
From: "Steve Caspersen" <mectau@attbi.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 11:54:02 -0800
References: <MBBBJHIBKCKEAEOKKBPOAEGJCEAA.bdcolen@earthlink.net>

It was set to A mode on the R8 and I had nothing set to alter the exposure.
But it could have been something I did.  Any other ideas?

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:32 AM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Kodachrome lab in Northern California


>
> From a lurker,
>
> I recently sent a roll of K-25 through a local dealer to Kodak in LA and
> most shots came out too dark (not the fault of the camera, an R8, as
> subsequent rolls showed).  Looked as if the lab had processed the K-25
with
> a batch of K-64.
>
> -----
>
> Dear Lurker - Dare one ask if it just might, possibly, conceivably, be
> possible that you accidentally, unintentionally, through no fault of your
> own, underexposed the entire roll by about a stop?
>
> /s/
>
> A Wondering Lugger
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] Kodachrome lab in Northern California)