Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]on 1/17/02 4:53 PM, Adam Bridge at abridge@mac.com wrote: > > I was talking with a friend today about what size to make a print. I had > printed > the PAW 3 image as a 5 x 7 since I knew I was going to make a final print and > I > was going to be doing a lot of trial and error. > > But it looks about right at that size. I think tomorrow I'll do an 8 x 10 but > I'm wondering about fitting size of print to the image. Some images just seem > to > want to be small and some large - but I never feel comfortable with what I've > selected. > > I was thinking that pictures with lots of fiddly bits would do better small > and > ones with open space would do better large where they could, I don't know, > "breathe" for want of a better term. > > Thoughts on this? > > Thanks > > Adam > Some print sizes are obvious, like little cute furry animals don't do well as a 16x20 print. OTOH, grizzly bears seem to require a reasonably large print. Grand expanses of scenery or scenery with lots of detail are big, while more intimate landscapes can be a medium size. Simplest compositions that are more shape and tone than detail tend to be the ones that work best as smaller sizes. Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento www.wildlightphoto.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html